Legal Opinion

Bruhn v. Pasco Land Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1912No. 9722PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Franklin county, Pendergast, J., entered April 25, 1911, refusing to vacate a default judgment, upon sustaining a demurrer to the petition.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

On April 10, 1907, Charles Bruhn and Pauline Bruhn, his wife, began an action against C. E. Mayne and Zilla Mayne, and others, to quiet title to certain real property, situated in Franklin county. In the complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that they were the owners in fee of the property described, and that the defendants claimed an estate or interest therein adverse to the plaintiffs, which claims were without right or validity and constituted a cloud upon the title of the plaintiffs. In the prayer for relief, they asked that the defendants be required to set forth the nature of their claims…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. BaldwinWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Spithill v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Carlson v. CurrenWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Garvey v. GarveyWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StilesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Corporate Loan & Security Co. v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Foster v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Collins v. Sea Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API