Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Carter

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 1, 1938No. [No. 76, October Term, 1938.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The appellees, as administratrices of the estate of their deceased mother, in their account and proposed distribution charged the share of the decedent’s surviving husband with funeral expenses and other claims, for which he was considered to be primarily liable but which the appellees had paid. This appeal is from an order of the Orphans’ Court overruling exceptions by the surviving husband to those charges. The principal item to which he made objection was an allowance of $300 for funeral expenses.

By section 5A of article 93 of the Code (1935 Supplement), it is provided:

“Whenever any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hemsley v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  2. McFerren v. Goldsmith-Stern Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  3. Gosnell v. FlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  4. Hoffman v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  5. Barnes v. Starr Ex Rel. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Condore v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Truax v. EllettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  3. Brack v. TingleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Condore v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Condore v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API