Legal Opinion
Kronenberg v. Baker & McKenzie LLP
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 18, 2010No. 09-cv-04137PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Pro se plaintiff David Kronenberg, a lawyer, initiated this lawsuit in 2009 against his former employer, Baker & McKenzie LLP (“Baker”), alleging, among other things, that Baker discriminated and retaliated against him in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12201 et seq., (“ADA”). Mr. Kronenberg claims that Baker failed to provide him reasonable or substitute accommodation after he informed human resources and a supervising partner that he was suffering from “a chronic…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Flowers v. OwensDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Stark v. Hartt Transportation Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2014
- Coleman v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- J.D. v. Williston Northampton SchoolDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Laudicina v. City of Crystal LakeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.