Legal Opinion
Payne v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 26, 1974No. Civ. A. 73-1023PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DITTER, District Judge.
The question in this case is whether the term “continuously disables” means that payment under an insurance contract should only be made for one period of disability. The matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment.
The plaintiff, Franklin L. Payne, is a physician licensed to practice in Pennsylvania. From 1945 to 1965, Dr. Payne was a professor and chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. In addition, he was the William Goodell Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology and had a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. Travelers Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Jacobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- Everhart v. State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- Bouvier v. Craftsman InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Kramer v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- INA Life Insurance Co. of New York v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Kolwicz v. American Health & Life InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979