Legal Opinion · Dissent

Todd v. Helton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1973No. B-3489Published

1DissentPope, Justice

I respectfully dissent. In my opinion, the majority result disregards the settled rule that the officer who calls a special election and sets in motion the election process may not later revoke his order and defeat the election and the right of the people to vote. A more serious error, in my opinion, is that the court has empowered those who contest an election process to thwart the canvass of the votes. If it be the purpose of this court to overrule our prior decisions, I would do so in an appropriate quo warranto action after the votes have been' regularly canvassed and the results declared.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Parks v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. City of Dallas v. Dallas Consolidated Street Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. City of El Paso v. RuckmanTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Ewing v. State Ex Rel. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Beyer v. Templeton, County JudgeTexas Supreme Court · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API