Legal Opinion

Gabelli & Co., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Liggett Group, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 8, 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARNETT, Vice Chancellor.

Defendants-Liggett Group, Inc. (“Lig-gett”) and GM Sub Corporation (“GM Sub”) moved to dismiss this action claiming that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The gravamen of the suit is whether, under the circumstances, a minority stockholder of a subsidiary corporation — faced with being cashed out by a merger orchestrated by the majority stockholder — -may compel payment of a dividend where he alleges breach of fiduciary duty by the parent corporation. For the reasons set forth, I hold that the complaint does not now state a cause…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sinclair Oil Corporation v. LevienSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  2. Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  4. Michelson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  5. Harman v. Masoneilan International, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Solomon v. ArmstrongCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1999
  2. Warren v. Century Bankcorporation, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Gabelli & Co. v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  4. In the Matter of Reading Company, Debtor. Appeal of Trailer Train CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Burton v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API