Gabelli & Co., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Liggett Group, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HARNETT, Vice Chancellor.
Defendants-Liggett Group, Inc. (“Lig-gett”) and GM Sub Corporation (“GM Sub”) moved to dismiss this action claiming that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The gravamen of the suit is whether, under the circumstances, a minority stockholder of a subsidiary corporation — faced with being cashed out by a merger orchestrated by the majority stockholder — -may compel payment of a dividend where he alleges breach of fiduciary duty by the parent corporation. For the reasons set forth, I hold that the complaint does not now state a cause…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sinclair Oil Corporation v. LevienSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
- Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- Michelson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Harman v. Masoneilan International, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Solomon v. ArmstrongCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1999
- Warren v. Century Bankcorporation, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Gabelli & Co. v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- In the Matter of Reading Company, Debtor. Appeal of Trailer Train CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Burton v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.