Legal Opinion

F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara San Martino S.P.A. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 2, 1997No. Consolidated Court No. 96-08-01930PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1125Opinion

Restani, Judge:

Commerce moves to strike the affidavits of William Silverman and Douglas J. Heffner, attached to plaintiffs La Molisana In-dustrie Alimentan S.p.A. (“La Molisana”) and Rummo S.p.A. Molino e Pastificio’s (“Rummo”) motion for judgment on the agency record.

Background

The affidavits describe telephone conversations between Gary Taver-man and John Brinkman, Commerce officials responsible for conducting the antidumping investigation, and William Silverman and Douglas Heffner, attorneys at Rogers & Wells, representing La Molisana and Rummo. The affidavits describe telephone…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
  2. Saha Thai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  3. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  4. Smith Corona Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  2. Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  3. Hyundai Electronics Industries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  4. Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  5. Sanyo Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API