Legal Opinion

Ampco Printing-Advertisers ' Offset Corp. v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1964PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

On these direct appeals on constitutional grounds from judgments rendered at Special Term, we are called *19upon to determine the constitutionality of the New York City Commercial Rent or Occupancy Tax Law.

In the first of the above-entitled actions—Ampco v. City of New York — the plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that chapter 257 of the Laws of 1963, the enabling act for the tax in question, and Local Law No. 38 of the City of New York for 1963, the law imposing the tax, are void and unconstitutional. The plaintiff Ampco is engaged in business on leased premises, the plaintiff Katz operates…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Wanamaker v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Neuman v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Carey Transportation, Inc. v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. MTR. OF JOSLIN v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API