Legal Opinion

In re C.V.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1998No. 20277PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ l.JWe are faced with the question whether in an abuse and neglect proceeding the circuit court violated a father’s statutory and due process rights in failing to conduct an. adjudicatory hearing, when it nonetheless provided him a dispositional hearing before terminating his parental rights. We conclude the court erred in not holding an adjudicatory hearing for the father, but nonetheless affirm because in the unique circumstances of this ease, remanding to conduct such hearing would not change the outcome.

Facts

[¶ 2.]On September 13, 1993, with his two-year-old daughter,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. State v. MichalekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re Interest of Amber G.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re J.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of Social ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In the Matter of JCMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Meldrum v. NovotnySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Francisco Calleja-Ahedo v. Compass Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API