Legal Opinion

Krasauski v. Birbalas

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 3, 1964No. Gen. 49,070PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE MURPHY

delivered the opinion of the court.

In a single action in the Superior Court of Cook County, plaintiff sought to set aside a will, in which defendant is named sole beneficiary, and also, to set aside deeds which resulted in defendant’s sole ownership of the decedent’s real estate. The trial court dismissed the action after sustaining defendant’s motion to dismiss, grounded on the premise that the court did not have “jurisdiction of the subject matter” and that “Plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue.” Plaintiff’s appeal to the Supreme Court was transferred here…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eckland v. JankowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Blyman v. Shelby Loan & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Crooker v. McArdleIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Barnett v. BarnettIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Shelby Loan & Trust Co. v. MilliganIllinois Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Alfred K. Ryder, United States of America v. Mary Ann RyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. Fort Dearborn Cartage Company ex rel. Chubb & Son, Inc. v. Rooks Transfer Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Rudnick v. VokatyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Williams v. Chenoweth (In Re Chenoweth)District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1992
  5. Estate of Murphy v. MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API