Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Barnett

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1918No. 12208PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. Clyde E. Stone, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Duncan

Appellee, Dániel Barnett, filed a bill for partition in the circuit court of Peoria county against Bartholomew J. Barnett, John W. Barnett, Agnes Stillwell, Mary Nolan, Mary Hoey and Sarah E. Casey. Mary Nolan and Agnes Still-well answered the bill, denying all knowledge of the allegations and calling for strict proof. Replication was filed and the other defendants defaulted. The cause was referred to the master in chancery to take and report proofs with findings. The master found from the evidence taken that the allegations of the bill were true and recommended partition and the assignment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dibble v. WinterIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Harrison v. WeatherbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Reed v. KempIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Lewis v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Amrine v. HamerIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sternberg v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Perez v. Fred Harvey, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Eckland v. JankowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Williams v. Chenoweth (In Re Chenoweth)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 1991
  5. Cobb v. WillrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API