Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Jackson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2000No. NonePublished

1DissentSabers, Justice

[¶29.] The Fourth Amendment directs that “no Warrants shall issue but upon probable cause ... and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” U.S. Const, amend. IV. As a general rule, “open-ended” or “general” warrants are constitutionally prohibited. Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 92 n. 4, 100 S.Ct. 338, 342 n. 4, 62 L.Ed.2d 238, 246 n. 4 (1979) (citations omitted). Thus, particularity in a search warrant is required to ensure that the executing officer can reasonably ascertain and identify the persons or places authorized to be searched and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Lippert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. State v. SimsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API