Joseph v. Henry
District Court, Virgin Islands
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam 1
In this appeal, appellants ["Henrys"] challenge the Territorial Court's decision (a) finding that appellants breached their contract of sale by violating restrictive covenant; and (b) granting injunctive relief to appellees based on the breach. For the reasons cited below, we find no clear error in the Territorial Court's finding that a breach occurred. However, we hold that the trial court erred in finding that the breach was intentional. Finally, because no intentional breach was exhibited and because appellees have an adequate remedy at law, injunctive relief was not…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Kroblin Refrigerated Xpress, Inc. v. PitterichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- U & W Industrial Supply, Inc. v. Martin Marietta Alumina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Gulf Trading Corp. v. National Enterprises of St. Croix, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- King v. Township of East LampeterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Berne Corp. v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2000
- St. Thomas-St. John Hotel & Tourism Ass'n v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands ex rel. Virgin Islands Department of LaborDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1999
- Virgin Islands Port Authority v. Virgin Islands Taxi Ass'nDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1997
- Equivest St. Thomas, Inc. v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.