Legal Opinion
Freas v. BMW of N. Am., LLC
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 1, 2018No. Case No.: 3:17-cv-01761-H-AGSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
(1) A statement of the availability of the informal dispute settlement mechanism;(2) The name and address of the Mechanism, or the name and a telephone number of the Mechanism which consumers may use without charge;(3) A statement of any requirement that the consumer resort to the Mechanism before exercising rights or seeking remedies created by Title I of the [Magnuson-Moss Warranty] Act; together with the disclosure that if a consumer chooses to seek redress by pursuing rights and remedies not created by Title I of the Act, resort to the Mechanism would not be required by any provision of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Gennifer Flowers v. James Carville Hillary Rodham Clinton Little, Brown & Co. George StephanopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- McCann v. Foster Wheeler LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Fannie Harrison v. Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Marina Milicevic, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Fletcher Jones Imports, Ltd. Mercedes-Benz Usa, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barboza v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Samarneh v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025