Legal Opinion
National Iranian Tanker Co. (Nederland), N. V. v. Tug Dalzell 2
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 8, 1968No. 64 Ad. 1263PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BONSAL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, National Iranian Tanker Company (Nederland), N.V., instituted this admiralty action seeking to recover for damages to the tank vessel REZA SHAH THE GREAT (the tanker) allegedly sustained by reason of a collision at Hell Gate in the East River, New York, between the tanker and the car-float NEW HAVEN 65 (the NH 65), which carfloat, with carfloat NEW HAVEN 68 (the NH 68), was in tow of the tug DALZELL 2 (the tug). The tug and tow, the NH 65 on the tug’s port side and the NH 68 on her starboard side, are hereinafter referred to as the flotilla. This…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- The Victory & the PlymothianSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Red Star Towing & Transportation Co. v. Tug CatherineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Marine Contracting & Towing Co. v. McMeekin Construction Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
- National Iranian Tanker Co. v. Tug Dalzell 2Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- National Iranian Tanker Company (Nederland), N.V. v. The Tug Dalzell 2Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969