Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Pillsbury
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
This action was brought on the law-equity side to review, enjoin enforcement of, and have set aside as “not in accordance with law”, 33 U.S.C.A. § 921 (b), that portion of a compensation order under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 44 Stat.' 1424 (1927), 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-950, granting Clarence Rupert $2,000 “on account of serious facial disfigurement”, in addition to a full statutory award for “permanent total disability.” Id. § 908 (a).
The suit should have been brought in admiralty, and upon the Court’s own initiative is transferred to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lawson v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Doucette v. VincentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Jordine v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Wheeling Corrugating Co. v. McManigalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Villanueva Pérez v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1980
- Cuarisma v. Urban Painters, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978