Legal Opinion

Steinicke v. Harr

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1924No. 12623PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

This action was filed in the district court of Ottawa county by plaintiff in error, Marie Steinicke, plain tiff toelow, against Neil Harr, U. S. Jennings, and tbe National Surety Company of New York, as surety on tbe official bond of Neil Harr, defendants in error, defendants below, to recover damages for false arrest and imprisonment by tbe sheriff, Neil Harr, and bis deputy, U. S. Jennings, and for convenience tbe parties will be designated as they appeared in tbe court below.

Plaintiff in her petition alleges that Neil Harr was tbe duly elected and acting sheriff of Ottawa…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lowe v. the City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  2. Dunlap v. NortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Dysart v. LurtySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. Hughes v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Hixon v. CuppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  3. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API