Legal Opinion

Scott v. City of Millen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 1, 1980No. 58289PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

1. In its order granting summary judgment the trial court recited that the "entire file” had been considered. Accordingly, the enumeration of error asserting that the court erred as a matter of law "in failing to consider all of the depositions on file in the matter” is without merit. General Motors Corp. v. Walker, 244 Ga. 191 (259 SE2d 449) (1979).

2. Plaintiffbrought this wrongful death action in two counts. As to Count 1, based on negligence, defendant states in its brief: "The substantive issue in this case turns on whether or not the City of Millen operated Lincoln Park…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Bowman v. GunnellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Cornelisen v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. General Motors Corp. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Petty v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rainey v. City of East PointCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Robinson v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. Johnson v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Robinson v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API