Grey v. Newark Plank Road Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On quo warranto. On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see ante p. 51.
1Opinion of the Court
The»opinion of .the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
We concur in the opinion of the Supreme Court, but we think that the judgment entered was not thereby warranted. In its concluding sentence the opinion declares that the defendant company will still continue to be a body corporate for the purposes in section 59 of the act concerning corporations specified. The reference is to section 59 of the act of April 7th, 1875, now section 53 of the act of April 21st, 1896 (Pamph. L., p. 277), which ordains that “all corporations, whether they expire by their own limitation or be annulled by the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Coney v. HarneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
3Cited by8 opinions
- Berger v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Carpenter & Carpenter, Inc. v. KinghamWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
- Harris-Woodbury Lumber Co. v. CoffinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1910
- Rubert Hermanos, Inc. v. People of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- L. Bucki & Son Lumber Co. v. Atlantic Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.