Legal Opinion

State v. Withrow

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The defendant pleaded not guilty to' an information charging that on June 15, 1935, at Grant county, he “did use for public service a grade stallion for breeding purposes without first having the same registered with the department of agriculture and markets, contrary to> sec. 95.01 (2), Stats. 1935.” Trial was to the court without a jury. The court adjudged the defendant guilty.

The use for public service, as that term is defined in the statute, of a grade stallion without procuring' a certificate of registration is admitted. The point of the case is that it was impossible for the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. McGuireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Briggs v. HuntonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Josam Manufacturing Co. v. State Board of HealthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. KerndtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. BrownsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  4. Buhler v. Department of Agriculture & MarketsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Laufenberg v. Cosmetology Examining BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API