Stegall v. Robinson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
The dispositive question presented here is whether defendants had record notice of restrictive covenants governing a subdivision, where the covenants were not recorded as part of the subdivision plat but were recorded with the first conveyance out of lots in the subdivision. Relying on Reed v. Elmore, 246 N.C. 221, 98 S.E. 2d 360 (1957), we hold that they did have record notice and therefore that the trial court properly entered summary judgment against them.
I
The parties own lots in Blocks B and C of the Boulevard Heights Subdivision, which was laid out in a plat filed by their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Finley v. Glenn Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Hege v. SellersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Reed v. ElmoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Hill v. Pinelawn Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harborgate Property Owners Ass'n v. Mountain Lake Shores Development Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- O'Neal by and Through Small v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Gregory v. FloydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Haw River Land & Timber Company, Incorporated George W. Riddle v. Lawyers Title Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Citifinancial Mortgage Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.