Petersen v. Petersen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Petersen attempts to appeal from a dissolution judgment. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
FACTS
The judgment and decree dissolving the marriage of Paul and Mary Petersen was entered January 6, 1984. Appellant Paul Petersen, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals on April 4, 1984. The notice did not include proof of service on respondent Mary Petersen or the clerk of the trial court. Appellant served respondent with notice of appeal on April 10, 1984, but did not serve notice on the clerk of the trial court.
ISSUE
Where appellant’s notice of appeal…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Township of Honner v. Redwood CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Hansing v. McGroartyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Wise v. BixCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Certified Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013