In re Hawk
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROST, Justice.
The issues presented in this appeal arise out of a will contest tried to the court, but are purely procedural in nature. The appellant, Linda Hawk, essentially complains that the trial court used the wrong procedural vehicle to grant her request to supplement the record with an inadvertently omitted audio cassette tape, arguing that the court should have granted this relief through her motion to reopen the evidence instead of by granting her motion for new trial for that limited purpose. She raises the following procedural issues, all of which relate to the trial court’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wentworth v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- D/FW Commercial Roofing Co., Inc. v. Mehra, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Equitable General Insurance Co. of Texas v. YatesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- In re A.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Dove v. DIR., STATE EMP. WORKERS'COMP., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gloria Gurka and Eric Brock v. Tracy Gurka, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- First Capital Interest, L.L.C. v. Gonzalez, Felipe and Maria and All Occupants, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Garry L. Rollins and Carla D. Rollins v. Texas College and MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A "A-1 Rent All", Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015
- Gina Lively and Robert Lively v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc. D/B/A Huguley Memorial Medical Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
- Gina Lively and Robert Lively v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc. D/B/A Huguley Memorial Medical Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.