Legal Opinion

Claim of Magrossi v. City of Niagara Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Claimant, while in the employ of the city of Niagara Falls, was injured through the negligence of a third party. He elected to pursue his remedy against such third party in accordance with section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Such an action was instituted against the third party and thereafter, with the city’s consent, compromised for the sum of $5,000 for personal injuries and medical and hospital expenses. Claimant then applied for deficiency compensation. The Industrial Board awarded him $647.27 for medical expenses incurred prior to the filing of the notice of election to hold…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Claim of Hogan v. Lawlor & Cavanaugh Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  2. Claim of Wolkenstein v. Luminart Lampshade Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. Calhoun v. West End Brewing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Wenger v. Pullman Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API