Reinhart v. Young
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Hightower
Because I would abolish the unavoidable accident instruction, which I view as misleading, confusing and unnecessary, I respectfully dissent.
The Court observes that at least eighteen states have determined that the unavoidable accident instruction is never appropriate in a negligence case and that fifteen other states have severely criticized or limited the instruction’s use.1 The Court notes that “it shares [the] reservations” of these jurisdictions yet fails to give litigants any additional guidance regarding the proper application of an instruction which the Court admits may mislead the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Acord v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Lemos v. MontezTexas Supreme Court · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.