Legal Opinion

Artex Refining Co. v. Pollard & Lawrence

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 5, 1939No. 5312Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

Appellants in their motion for rehearing earnestly insist that we were in error in our original opinion, handed down on January 5th, 1939, affirming the judgment of the court below, for the reason that this appeal presents fundamental error in the following particular: Appellees in their original petition alleged the residence of appellants to be in Smith County, Texas, but service of citation was had upon them in Cooke County, Texas. Appellants cite in support of this contention Walden v. Locke, Tex.Civ.App., 33 S.W.2d 475; Tyler v. Blanton, 34 Tex.Civ.App. 393, 78…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lauderdale v. R. & T. A. Ennis Stationery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Friend v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Massie Drilling Co. v. NeesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  4. Pierson v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Tyler v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API