Legal Opinion

Thorp's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 2, 1947No. 9389PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Circuit Judge.

Questions concerning the interpretation and applicability of Section 811 (d) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A.Int. Rev.Code, § 811 (d) (2), form the basis of taxpayer’s appeal.

In 1918, Charles M. Thorp, the decedent, created an inter vivos trust, of which his wife was made trustee and life beneficiary of the trust income. Paragraphs 5 and 6 of the trust indenture read as follows:

“5. After the death of Jessie B. Thorp [wife of decedent], said income shall be paid to our six children [naming children] * * * in equal shares, during their respective lives.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Helvering v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Marks v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  2. In Re Inman's Estate. Shiland v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  3. United States v. Martin Wright GordonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Hauptfuhrer's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  5. Grossman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API