Beasley v. Horrell
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEWIS, Judge.
Plaintiffs, William A. Beasley, III, and Sarah Beasley, appeal from the trial court’s granting of defendants’ motion for summary judgment and the resulting judgment entered for the defendants which cancelled a $100,000.00 note made by defendants and payable to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also appealed from the trial court’s refusal to reform the note.
Plaintiffs filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that the cancellation provision in a $100,000.00 non-negotiable promissory note made by defendants is an unenforceable penalty and, also, sought to have the note…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Airline Construction, Inc. v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- Hanover Insurance Company v. HaneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Evans v. MoseleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Jennings v. First National Bank of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Patterson v. Anderson Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Guiliano v. Cleo, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Brooks v. Networks of Chattanooga, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
- Vanderbilt University v. Gerry DinardoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Kimbrough & Co. v. SchmittCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
- Shoney's, Inc. v. MorrisDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.