Legal Opinion

Laird v. Bannon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1912No. 2483PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; A. N. Munden, Judge. Actioñ between Samuel B. Laird and L. Bannon. From the judgment, Laird brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This case presents error from the superior court of Oklahoma county. The proceeding is not instituted by either case-made or bill of exceptions, but is here upon a transcript of the record. The only assignment of error contained in the petition in error is that the court erred in overruling the motion of plaintiff in error for a new trial. A motion to dismiss has been filed by counsel for defendant in error for the reason that the record before us presents no error subject to review. This motion must be sustained. That motions are no part of the record proper and are not brought to this court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tribal Development Co. v. White Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. McMechan v. ChristySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hillery v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Exchange Nat. Bank of Ardmore v. MerrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. McGuire v. RashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. University Realty Co. v. EnglishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Whitehead v. R. E. Holmes' SonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API