Legal Opinion

Pomeroy v. Hogle

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1945No. Civil No. 4709PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LaPBADE,. J.

The appellees Hogle and "wife filed an action in the lower court to quiet the title in them to two certain lots in the Town of Mesa City, Arizona. Among the named defendants were Minnie Pomeroy and Maricopa County, Arizona. The county answered through its board of supervisors. Plaintiffs in their complaint alleged that the lots in question had come into the ownership of the state by virtue of a tax sale, and that the board of supervisors had thereafter advertised said property for sale at private sale. They alleged further that they submitted a bid of $1,800 casb. With reference…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Dazet v. LandryNevada Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Mears v. BiddleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923
  4. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  5. Ray v. FryeArizona Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Association v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  2. Hecketsweiler v. ParrettOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State Ex Rel. Hecht v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API