Legal Opinion

State v. Smyers

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2004No. CR-03-0284-PRPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 This case requires us to examine again whether a defendant must testify in order to preserve for appeal a challenge to an adverse pretrial ruling allowing the defendant’s prior convictions to be admitted for impeachment purposes. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to Article VI, Section 5.3 of the Arizona Constitution and Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 13-4031 (2001).

I

¶ 2 On June 8, 2001, the State charged Daniel Smyers with two counts of furnishing obscene or harmful items to a minor. Prior to trial, the State filed a motion based upon…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. New Jersey v. PortashSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. CorrellArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. SchrockArizona Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. EllisonArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. RichmondSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. State v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Chalpin v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API