Legal Opinion
Timm v. Van Buskirk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 25, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Bellerose dated March 10, 2003, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioners’ application for a waiver of construction réstrictions imposed by Bellerose Village Code § 210-48, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated October 27, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding as barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The principles of res judicata apply to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Sterling Doubleday Enterprises v. MarroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Jensen v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Waylonis v. BaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Palm Management Corp. v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Kogel v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kreisberg v. ScheyerNew York Supreme Court · 2006