Legal Opinion
Lazar v. Steinberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 30, 1945PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by defendants from an order of the City Court of Yonkers denying their motion for judgment on the pleadings and granting plaintiffs’ cross motion to strike out defendants’ affirmative defense on the ground that such defense is insufficient in law. Order modified on the law (1) by striking out the word “ defendants’ ” in the first ordering paragraph and inserting after the word “ motion ” the words “ of defendant Somers ”; and (2) by inserting the following ordering paragraph: “Ordered that the motion of defendant Steinberg for judgment on the pleadings be and the same is hereby…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kuhn v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Ferro v. Leopold Sinsheimer Estate, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Stroock Plush Co. v. TalcottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Culhane v. Economical Garage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Nivogor Realty Corp. v. Gifford-Wood Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by5 opinions
- Artonio v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Jewtraw v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- W. T. Grant Co. v. Uneeda Doll Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Schwartz v. Queensboro Farm Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- Nyholm v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961