Legal Opinion

SB & W Realty Corp. v. New York City Water Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

*292The determination is rationally based (see generally Matter of MHG Family Ltd. Partnership v New York City Water Bd., 46 AD3d 472 [2007]) on evidence that the meter that was installed on petitioner’s property before the June 30, 2000 deadline was not sealed and did not have a remote reading device, and since it could not be read, was useless. Petitioner’s claim that it had no way of knowing that the meter, allegedly installed by respondent’s contractor, was not installed properly is undermined by respondent’s notices to petitioner, which should have alerted petitioner that respondent believed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MHG Family Ltd. Partnership v. New York City Water BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Pistilli Associates III, LLC v. New York City Water BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Haav 575 Realty Corp. v. New York City Water BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API