Legal Opinion

Blum v. General Electric Co.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided February 27, 2008No. 2:07-mj-00099Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS WHO PREVIOUSLY STIPULATED TO DISMISSAL WITH LIMITED TIME TORE-FILE

PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, District Judge.

On this day, the Court considered Defendants Lucent Technologies, Inc., General Electric Company, Raytheon Company, and Honeywell International, Ine.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) “Motion to Dismiss the Claims of Plaintiffs Who Previously Stipulated to Dismissal with Limited Time to Re-File,” (“Motion”) filed on May 31, 2007; Plaintiffs Harald Schwankl (“Schwankl”), Klaus Schneider (“Schneider”),…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Cuvillier v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API