Legal Opinion

State v. Aplaca

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1992No. 15402PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MOON, J.

Petitioner-appellant Carol Aplaca (Aplaca) was convicted of one count of Assault in the Third Degree in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 707-712(l)(a) (1985). Subsequent to her conviction, she moved for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel, which was denied.

On appeal, Aplaca maintained that the trial court applied the wrong standard of proof in adjudging her guilty and that she was denied her right to effective assistance of counsel. The ICA affirmed Aplaca’s conviction by memorandum opinion, 1 concluding the trial court applied the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. TemplinUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. BatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. AntoneHawaii Supreme Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. RichieHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. KelekolioHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. WallaceHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API