Berlew v. State

ON SECOND MOTION FOR REHEARING.

October 20, 1920.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

At the urgent insistence of appellant, this Court permitted the filing of his second motion for rehearing.

Practically the only question presented, is that we erred in our former opinions herein, in holding the action of the trial court correct in refusing to charge on the question of accomplices. We have carefully reviewed the facts and authorities presented by appellant in his second motion, but find ourselves unable to agree to the contentions made. We think most of the authorities cited by appellant are against him: that one…