Legal Opinion
Grays Harbor Stevedore Co. v. Marshall
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 16, 1929No. 671 and 693PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOURQUIN, District Judge.
These are proceedings pursuant to the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, title 33, section 902 et seq., USCA, to review and set aside certain compensation orders made by the deputy commissioner upon evidence presented in hearings before him. To that end, plaintiffs allege only that the orders are contrary to law, for that there was no evidence presented as aforesaid which supports them.
The deputy has not certified the evidence as he should, but transcripts are filed which the parties agree contain it. Of course, upon it alone have been the instant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon BoroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Washington Ex Rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. FairchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wheeling Corrugating Co. v. McManigalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- National Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of District of Columbia v. Britton, Deputy Com'rCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Rothschild & Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Liberty Stevedoring Co. v. CardilloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1937
- Wilson & Co. v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.