Legal Opinion

State v. Edy

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The defendant demurred to the indictment on the ground that the facts stated therein failed to constitute a crime. The court overruled the demurrer and the defendant assigns error of the court in such ruling. He argues that the indictment should have stated the age of the defendant, and in support of his contention cites Section 1912, Or. L.

In some jurisdictions, where the age of the male is fixed by statute which designates as rape all carnal knowledge of the body of a female under a certain age, it is held necessary to allege and prove the age of the defendant: Wistrand v. People. 213 Ill.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sustar v. County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Wistrand v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. KnightenOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Young v. the Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smallman v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State v. WingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. State v. HiltonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State v. NesmithOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. WinfreeOregon Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API