Owings v. Rose
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McAllister, j.
This is an action for indemnity. The plaintiffs are architects, who employed the defendants as consulting engineers on two construction projects and contend that on both jobs they had to pay damages on account of the negligence of defendants in the performance of their engineering services. The jury found for plaintiffs on their first cause of action and defendants appeal. The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiffs’ second cause of action and plaintiffs cross-appeal.
Plaintiffs’ first cause of action arises out of plaintiffs’ employment by Omark Industries to design and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Lamb v. Belt Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Klatt v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Astoria v. Astoria & Columbia River R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Securities-Intermountain, Inc. v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Simpson v. SISTERS OF CHARITY OF PROVIDENCE, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Beglau v. AlbertusOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Davidson Lumber Sales, Inc. v. Bonneville Investment, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Kemper Architects, P.C. v. McFall, Konkel & Kimball Consulting Engineers, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.