Legal Opinion

Geiss-America v. Fraser

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 21, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

There are here presented two motions. The motion by the defendant M. Neufeld & Co. is one to dismiss the action or, in lieu thereof, to quash the return of service of summons on the ground (a) that *322M. Neufeld & Co. is a partnership doing business in the Republic of Germany and is not sub j ect to service of process within the Southern District of New York, and (b) that M. Neufeld & Co. has not been properly served with process in this action. The motion by defendant Fraser is one to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action against him.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. French v. Gibbs Corporation. Henry v. Gibbs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  4. Satterfield v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  5. Nugey v. Paul-Lewis Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Top Form Mills, Inc. v. Sociedad Nationale Industria Applicazioni ViscosaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API