Sloat v. Matheny
Colorado Court of Appeals
1DissentSternberg, Judge
Because I perceive no reason to carve out an exception to the doctrine of implied warranties of a builder-vendor, and because I believe that such an exception creates undue difficulties in application of the doctrine, I dissent.
Colorado is recognized as a leader in the development of the implied warranty rule. Note, The Doctrine of Caveat Emptor as Applied To Both The Leasing & Sale Of Real Property: The Need For Reappraisal & Reform, 2 Rutgers-Camden L.J. 120 (1970); Tavares v. Horstman, 542 P.2d 1275 (Wyo.1975). Until the 1950’s one who built and sold a home was protected by the doctrine of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- Tavares v. HorstmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Duncan v. Schuster-Graham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Yepsen v. BurgessOregon Supreme Court · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.