Legal Opinion
State v. DILLS STICE
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 14, 1966PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
The defendants, Wanda Dills, and Chester Leon Stice, her son, were indicted separately for the crime of first degree arson, the unlawful setting of fire to and burning a dwelling house: ORS 164.020. By agreement they were tried together, were convicted, and have appealed.
Since the defendant Wanda Dills assigns error to the court’s denial of her motion for a directed verdict of acquittal based on the ground that the sole evidence of her guilt was furnished by an accomplice, it is necessary to set forth the evidence in some detail.
The accomplice is Carolyn (also referred to as Marilyn)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. NeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. FairOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. EarpOregon Supreme Court · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.