United States v. Taylor
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(August 9, 2017)
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Presently before the Court are Defendant Donald Earl Taylor’s [23] Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, and Mr. Taylor’s [26] Supplemental Motion to Vacate Judgment Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Upon a searching review of the parties’ submissions, 1 the relevant authorities, and the record as a whole, the-Court finds that Mr. Taylor no longer qualifies for a sentencing enhancement pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal. Act based on his prior criminal convictions, in light of the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. ArringtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- United States v. CarrDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.