Legal Opinion

La Societe Francaise D'eparngnes et de Prevoyance Mutuelle v. Selheimer

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 7,291PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Sullivan, J. After the decision, the appellant filed her petition for a rehearing, and the application was denied.

1Opinion of the Court

Sharpstein, J.:

The plaintiff brought an action to foreclose a mortgage executed by one B. J. Shay; and the appellant, who purchased the mortgaged premises from Shay subsequently to the execution of the mortgage, was made a party defendant for the purpose of having her equity of redemption foreclosed. She answered and alleged, among other things, that the transaction between Shay and the plaintiff was not a real loan, but that the money which Shay obtained from the plaintiff was advanced by it to him, in order that he might purchase the property for *624the plaintiff, and then sell it for a much…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fish v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Curnow v. GravelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Downing v. Le DuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Avery Manufacturing Co. v. CrumbNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API