Legal Opinion

Flynn v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 29, 1916No. Gen. No. 20,641PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Enoch E. Newlin, Judge, presiding. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

5. Trial, § 87*—when reopening of case to hear further evidence within discretion of court. Where an action is heard by the court without a jury, the allowance of a motion to reopen and hear further evidence after having announced a finding is within the sound discretion of the court. 6. Trial, § 87*—when court does not abuse its discretion to reopen case to hear further evidence. In an action to recover salary as a police patrolman, where it appeared that plaintiff was discharged as such patrolman on August 20, 1903, that he brought a petition for mandamus on June 19; 1906, to compel his…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cord v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API