Legal Opinion

Wood v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1931No. 14081PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is embezzlement; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

M. H. Leventhal, agent of Eureka Vacuum Cleaner Company, had employed appellant to sell vacuum cleaners. Appellant sold a vacuum cleaner to M. L. Tarver, for which he received a check in the sum of $64.50. Appellant appropriated the proceeds of the check to his own use and benefit. C. W. Dozier, assistant treasurer of the company, testified -that he did not give appellant his consent to appropriate the amount of money in question. He further testified that the company owed appellant no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Wakefield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. David Alan Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  3. David Alan Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  4. Reymond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Tweedle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API