Legal Opinion
Windsor Mount Joy Mutual Insurance v. Giragosian
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 21, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-11184PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
THE ESCAPE
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW
YOUNG, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Windsor Mount Joy Mutual Insurance Company (“Windsor”), seeks a declaration of its rights and obligations with respect to its insureds, John and Deborah Giragosian (“the Giragosians”), the owners of the ESCAPE, a 34-foot sailboat which sunk in Boston Harbor. The Giragosians counterclaim for contract damages due to Windsor’s alleged improper failure to honor their insurance claim and for violations of Mass.Gen.L. chapters 93A and 176D. Following a jury- waived trial on the merits, the Court made findings of facts…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Knight v. U.S. Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Worcester Mutual Insurance v. MarnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Miller v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Sherman v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. LTD.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mt "Baltic Commander" Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013