Legal Opinion
In re Toledo Portland Cement Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 8, 1907No. 1,127PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Bankruptcy. On exceptions to findings of referee.
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, District Judge.
An involuntary petition was filed in the above-entitled cause against respondent, a Michigan corporation, praying that an adjudication of bankruptcy be entered against it for the matters charged in the petition. The referee has returned his findings of fact and law, which need not be here repeated at length. The referee held, upon the authority of In re White Mountain Paper Company, 127 Fed. 180, 11 Am. Bankr. Rep. 491, and White Mountain Paper Co. v. Morse, 11 Am. Bankr. Rep. 633, 127 Fed. 643, 62 C. C. A. 369, that the respondent was engaged in manufacturing, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Market Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- In re New York & W. Water Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1900
- Lawrence v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Murphy v. UtterSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- P. Lorrilard Co. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Dall v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
- Bollinger v. Central Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910