Legal Opinion

State v. Stoll

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 8, 1983No. FILE No. 1201Published

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

The defendant was convicted by the trial court of traveling unreasonably fast in violation of General Statutes § 14-218a. From this judgment the defendant has appealed. The defendant has raised the following issues: (1) the court erred in reference to his motions for discovery; (2) the court erred in its interpretation of the law concerning the use of radar to support a conviction of speeding; and (3) the prosecutor misused his office by depriving the defendant of his legal and constitutional rights to obtain exculpatory material.

The trial court found the following facts: On March 17, 1981,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. TomanelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  4. Presutti v. PresuttiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. State v. De SantisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API