State v. Stoll
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The defendant was convicted by the trial court of traveling unreasonably fast in violation of General Statutes § 14-218a. From this judgment the defendant has appealed. The defendant has raised the following issues: (1) the court erred in reference to his motions for discovery; (2) the court erred in its interpretation of the law concerning the use of radar to support a conviction of speeding; and (3) the prosecutor misused his office by depriving the defendant of his legal and constitutional rights to obtain exculpatory material.
The trial court found the following facts: On March 17, 1981,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. TomanelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Presutti v. PresuttiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. De SantisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.